Why I think the Toyota Gas Pedal fiasco probably makes us hypocrites. Or, How brand loyalty can get us killed.

January 31st, 2010

So, Toyota has had to undergo probably one of the most massive recalls in the history of their company.  The digs on it are here, but I will give a summary with my own snarky twist:

A staggering majority of the cars they have been selling for the past few years, and are still selling, had a fancy Throttle By Wire system which means that instead of the gas pedal being hooked to a throttle cable, the gas pedal is a fancy, more durable, foot operated joystick controller.  Unfortunately,  the people who made these pedals for Toyota, made a crappy one that tends to wear out after a few years and is more likely than it should be to get stuck in position other than “idle”.

To make the problem worse/scarier… Toyota didn’t program their carputers to go “Huh, the gas pedal is being floored, but the brakes are being applied, I’ll assume the driver is trying to stop,  ignore the throttle input, and idle the engine.”  Mercedes and several other manufacturers did just that.   The other problem is that many of these cars have the fancy Push-Button-Start that has come into vogue over the last couple of years… so a person’s instinct to go “ack, runaway car, turn it off!”  jab at the power button repeatedly with no effect (The driver has to hold the button down for 3 seconds to actually kill the engine.  Also, drivers that do this are dumb, their first instinct should be to put the car in neutral so they can keep power steering/boosted-brakes).

At first, Toyota thought the problem was a gas-pedal/floormat interaction problem.  So they issued a minor recall to shave down the bottom of the gas pedal so it wouldn’t get jammed behind the floormat.  Then, they found out the gas pedal was sticking All On It’s Own, and issued a massive recall, including stopping sales of new Toyotas until the gas pedals were shimmed or replaced.

This is a big problem that has actually killed people in spectacular “the car ran into the guardrail going 97 MPH” fashion, and scared the living bejeezus out of even more (nobody wants to have a “what’s stronger, my powertrain or my brakes?” contest in the middle of their morning commute.)

And all the while, most of the people I’ve overheard discussing it are acting like it’s not a big deal, and that Toyota’s are still reliable and wonderful and safe and probably going to be high on the list of possibilities for their next car.

My issue is that people are giving Toyota a rather generous pass on this one, which isn’t too bad, but they are giving them a pass when they would probably refuse to give an even more minor pass to other car manufacturers.

Remember back around the turn of the century, when Ford Explorers (and their cousins, Mercury Mountaineers and Mazda Navajos) were fitted with Firestone tires that had a nasty tendency to have tread separate during a rollover?  Ford was blamed by the public for making tippy cars with shitty tires… despite numerous tests by car magazines showing that if an Explorer was rolling along at 80 MPH and a tire blew out, it wouldn’t “just tip”.   The problem was that panicked people were doing really dangerous maneuvers (jerking the explorer hard to one side at high speed, then jerking it the other way when the car started sliding, which is pretty much the perfect way to get ANY vehicle to flip over, especially SUVs) and in the process, the tire tread separated, probably when the car was going 54 MPH sliding on one and a half wheels, and many a class action lawsuit was thrown around…  Fords and Firestone ended a very long relationship after screaming at each other… and Ford spent buckets of money putting Good Years and Michelins on their Explorers, which people still managed to occasionally flip over (but at least the tread was staying on the tire).

I feel a lot of the people who were complaining about how Ford was a crappy/evil car company and gosh aren’t they glad they got something other than an Explorer, are the same people now acting like sticking gas pedals from Toyota are a minor ‘whoops’ and they can’t believe it’s occurring with the ‘most reliable car company on the planet’.

And as a final irony… the whole “sudden unintended acceleration” issue almost killed Audi in the US back in the 80’s.  So many people were sure that Audi built crappy cars,  when really it was that the gas and the brake pedals were close together and people were hitting the wrong pedal while doing slow maneuvering and then trying to get Audi to pay for their new garage.

The fact of the matter is, Toyota is now huge.  I have pretty much started calling Toyota “The Next GM”… because while Toyota don’t suffer some of the issues that GM had during their big blowup (horrid corporate politics, union problems, redundant brands selling clones, several PR fiascoes, and an inability to make a non-crappy small car) they are now suffering two of the primary ones:  They are HUMONGOUS, and they are outsourcing a lot of their parts to suppliers.

  • Being big means all of your problems are big too.

When you make 100,000 Camrys, your 0.09% serious defect rate means that you have 90 cars that spontaneously burst into flames on the highway (0r something equally dramatic that results from a serious defect)  When you are making 5,000,000, then suddenly you have 4500 Camrys bursting into flames.  That’s 4500 more people with friends and relatives going “Oh my friend/relative got one of them and it burst into flames on the highway…”

Being huge also means you are no longer nimble, and your ability to respond to market pressures goes way down.  If everyone decides NiMH batteries suck for hybrids, Toyota’s already spent tons of money on making sure there will be NiMH batteries for the next four years for the bajillion Priuses and hybrid versions of their other cars.  They’ve already ramped up all the production capacity to put the hybrids together… so they’ll have to roll with the stigma of being ‘old school’ for those years trying to downplay the other car companies advertisements of using fancier Lithium-Ion technologies with a pudgy Luke Wilson.  And that’ll be right around the time they discover that NiMH (Or Luke Wilson) releases angry carcinogenic gas when exposed to cellphone radiation, or something similarly disastrous.

  • Outsourcing to suppliers means you inherit their problems

So, the supplier who gave Toyota their accelerator pedals is more at fault for a crappy design than Toyota is… But Toyota is responsible for checking such things to make sure they don’t get stiff despite people stomping on them repeatedly with crud-covered shoes and boots.  Right now Toyota’s being recalled are merely having their gas pedals shimmed and all the revised pedals are going to manufacturing plants.  Millions of cars are affected and this supplier was the only one really specializing in making accelerator pedals for a multitude of Toyotas.  This sort of problem has affected all the car manufacturers and the bigger you get and the more cars you sell the cheaper it becomes to outsource.  This also doesn’t excuse Toyota for programming the carputers to keep the engine straining even if it knows the brakes are being mashed (Shouldn’t that be an essential part of the stability control they tout on so many of their cars?)

Does this mean Toyota’s totally suck now?  No.  Should you scream “OH MY GOD MY GAS PEDAL IS STUCK SOMEBODY HELP MEEEE!” at every Toyota and Lexus commercial that comes on TV like I do?  Well, that’s up to you and how silly you feel when the commercial comes on.  Does it mean you should probably drop the whole “cars made by [company] are simply more reliable/valuable than cars made by [other company]” shtick?  I think so.

This whole fiasco has shown that even reliability juggernaut Toyota is fallible.  I’m also going to come right out and say that Honda’s might actually catch fire.  It is possible that the people saving a couple of thousand by buying a domestic vehicle might not actually be that dumb or foolhardy.  Thus, it is always a good idea to think that ANY car might go a bit crazy, and it is probably prudent to test a few competitors before getting the car you think you want.  It’s also advisable to take a defensive driving course (to know standard car limits in case of things like stuck gas pedals or blowing tires) and stay more aware of your surroundings when your driving.

Granted, I did not follow my own advice:  When I got my Mazda3, it was the first car I looked at and drove, and I was out the door with it so fast and excited with my first new car I didn’t even realize I had bought one without a safety package (which brings Side Air Bags and ABS).  To be fair, I was researching all the “hatch-butts that are not Volkswagen” for months before I got the Mazda3 and knew it was the front runner.  Meanwhile, the Toyota Matrix XRs seemed a bit too pricey.  As for the lack of safety equipment, I’d like to think I am more likely to check blind intersections and not tailgate.

Why I think most of the boycotts I come across are dumb…

January 30th, 2010

I can actually pinpoint the Exact Moment I formed the opinion that most boycotts were/are rather dumb (especially the histrionic “they were mean to Us so we need to punish Them” style boycotts that tend to be excreted from The Gay Community at least once a month).  It was when some gay guy with more money than sense crowed loudly on Autoblog how he was pissed over the Ford/American-Family-Association fiasco, so he sold his Explorer for a Jeep.   My long and snarky post on the matter is here, but I will give a summary:

Back around 2005, The American Family Association (a cranky anti-gay group of Fundamentalist Christians if ever there was) was boycotting Ford because Ford had advertisements  in Gay magazines.  Then one day, Ford said they would be changing their ads, and how they would advertise in gay magazines.  The American Family Association then sent out a press release/email blast saying that their boycott was successful, that Ford had met with the AFA, and was going to be canceling their gay advertising.  This caused a big uproar, especially among the more masochistic gays who were subscribed to the AFA mailing list just to keep tabs on how mean the AFA was being to them that month.

Problem was, the AFA was either ignorant, or just plain lying about the situation.   While they had met with Ford, Ford was basically agreeing to rent out a conference room and be screamed at in the interest of appearing to care before saying “sorry, we simply do not feel like alienating anyone, sorry you feel a need to boycott us”.   Ford was not removing their advertisements, they were merely scaling back.  Before, Ford paid for separate ads for Volvo, Jaguar, and Land Rover (all companies Ford owned at the time).  Ford was losing tons of cash because it was the gas crisis of the mid-naughts and they had banked too much on SUV’s continuing to sell and have high resale value… So their ad budget was being slashed and they decided to pay for fewer ads in Gay magazines that had ALL the Ford brands featured (Ford, Mercury, Lincoln, Volvo, Jaguar, Land Rover, and Mazda… because really, having a Land Rover Sport flanking two Miatas is a much easier way to show off how down you are with the gay lifestyle.  )

This did not stop a person who I eventually dubbed the Mega Militant Super Homo from having a huge hissy fit right after the AFA Blast, calling for a boycott and trading in his Ford Explorer, all the time whining about how he loved the local  Ford dealership and the people there… and when I called him on his actions,  and later pointed out that he essentially was played big-time by the AFA’s shenanigans,  he deleted his entire blog, and went to myspace where he could better cherry-pick his interactions.

Every time I have seen some gay person call for a boycott, it has been a version of the same story with the following points:

The first and biggest point:

  • a special note for the “the CEO doesn’t seem to like [whatever] so we should boycott his or her company” situations…

This train of thought means it’s okay to fire employees for their personal opinions or beliefs.  If one day America decides that gay people are crappy unreliable workers given to fits of pedophilia and/or sexaholism, and starts to prefer companies that are adamant about not-hiring gay people, then by all means, the companies will have pretty good justifications to fire all their gay employees.  Ironically, there seems to be a lot of interest in abolishing that sort of thinking… so why is it okay to try and get the CEO of Manhunt fired if he doesn’t decide to acquiesce and stop being a Republican?

  • The boycott is usually over something very small in terms of the corporation that is being sought to be boycotted.  Something like how ad-revenue is being spent, or a personal decision some high-level employee (CEO, CIO) made.

I’m sorry, but the CEO of manhunt giving money to a republican is not a big deal.  Ford pulling ads from gay magazines is not a big deal.  It is not the same thing as telling a black person they have to pay in the front of the bus, go back outside the bus, re-board through the back door of the bus, and then sit in the back… unless there is a white person who wants a seat, at which point the black person has to stand in the back of the bus.  That is what the Montgomery Bus Boycott (Rosa Parks, &c) was about. You refusing to watch the super bowl because CBS turning down an ad for a gay dating site is really not even near the same level of blatant and horrible discrimination.  When a restaurant chain decides to only let gay people order/receive food from the back door, or an auto dealership only allows people they perceive to be gay to buy certain models/colors… then we can start hitting the shiny red boycott button.

  • The boycott is often Really Easy and therefore sort of doomed to be ineffective.

Heck, sometimes I think people are just trying to drum up support for competitors.  If one froo-froo yuppie market is doing naughty things or is run by a butthole, it’s really easy to go to the other froo-froo yuppie market.  The other market is probably just as likely to be run by a butthole, just a butthole who had enough tact that month to not piss off Gay People.  Meanwhile, most of the world will perceive the infraction as mild at best and not care… or will say they’ll stop going and cluck about “the injustice of it all”  just to shut up whoever is trying to get action from them.  Meanwhile if the store issues an apology and a clarification, it will clear up in a jiffy, thus making the boycott organizers think they’re important, to the peril of the world.

  • The boycott organizers are often misinformed, or just sort of hateful.

My last point closed on clarification, because more often than not the infraction is summarized and omits several key details, or contains several fabrications.  Meanwhile, requests for more/better information are often met with exasperation and accusations containing words like “self-loathing”.

  • The boycott is much more likely to hurt employees who don’t have any sort of influence or ability to affect/correct the infraction.

The cashier and the store manager gets hurt by a roving band of gays deciding to convince their friends to not shop at some store any more.  To the CEO and the ad department, it’s just a couple of bad months in a particular section of the country.  The cashiers will get laid off, not the head of the marketing department, and the cashiers aren’t the ones who signed off on whatever ad-campaign pissed people off.

So yeah.  I think boycotts in the present era are dumb.  The types of prejudice and bigotry that America faced during the civil rights era were permeating really big companies through all levels, and real sacrifices had to be made to stop using said companies (usually the only source for particular items or services).  I’m not saying there aren’t some companies that don’t deserve a boycott, but I don’t feel they are large or extend beyond a particular community.

So I probably won’t be supporting your boycott, no matter how noble.  I suggest you write a letter to whoever did what you perceive to be wrong, and only after doing a lot of research from both sides to get the whole story behind the infraction.  If you can’t be bothered to do that much, then I don’t feel you have any business boycotting anybody.

Doing Weird.

January 20th, 2010

Greetings all, I hope you are all well.

Last night,  I got a call that entered me into a strange spot of familial drama.  I am waiting for a call that will have more details, but needless to say, it’s weirded me out… and might end up being weirder, sadder, hilarious, or some combination of the three.  In the meantime, I am sitting at home with bunched-up guts trying to resist calling every 15 minutes for updates.  I am also watching Mrs. Doubtfire (one of those movies I will watch from any point to the end… I just love it and always find something new every time I watch it) and baking cookies (I made a joke about baking cookies for a little office update thingy… and now I feel a bit obligated to follow through… that and I get cookies out of it).

Otherwise, this is my attempt to blog more.  Summarize my day, mention a few things I love, and of course.. post some things that are on the Internet and awesome.  The first is that @Braindouche managed to tweet this… and the second is that the ever-so-awesome @amerinz had an annual number increase.  Go to both and show them some love for being generally cool as glaciers.

In the meantime, if you are looking for something fun on Wikipedia, check out Crater Lake … and I am in the final throes of Pride and Prejudice. I find it helps if I sass the book occasionally:  ”Oh no Mister Wickam… OH NO YOU DIDN…”

Cheers, have a good night.

Doing fine.

January 18th, 2010

Greetings those of you who follow me on the Internet, I have had that inclination to make a blog post all weekend, and am finally sitting down on an unexpected day off to make it.

  • What I am doing:  Sitting here astounded by an unexpected holiday (the last one before Memorial day 5 months from now)  Sitting here making a blog post on my recently updated blogging software.  Im also trying to make the most of my spare time by cleaning the house:  I’ve scrubbed most of the kitchen surfaces, and also hope to scrub the bathroom and living room surfaces and vacuum and scrub the floor and maybe even work out before going to a friends dinner thing… wish me luck.
  • What’s happened since Christmas:   I managed to read Picture of Dorian Gray and am in the middle-end of Pride and Prejudice on my new Kindle (Thanks Spud!).  I am hoping to finish it soon so I can start Pride and Prejudice and Zombies within a fortnight.  I am also admiring the new La-Z-Boy couch which was just delivered Friday (Thanks Mom!)  I went to work, waking up early to avoid traffic, even on a day that showed Atlanta is really unprepared for any sort of winter accumulation (one inch of snow basically got compressed and turned into ice by Friday morning) and have been better about not going out to eat all the time.  I’ve also kept with my plans of going to the gym and while I have hit a plateau, I did not gain any during the holidays, so I guess that is an indication of something.
  • What I am hoping to do in the new year:  Keep all the new stuff in order.  Keep the new floors and accompanying carpets vacuumed,  keep the couch clean, read several new books with the nifty new e-reader, be responsible with respect to budgets and safety, hopefully lose some weight or at least unpack some of the fridge around the tummy (now with new phase of healthy living:  avoid eating total crap more than 40% of the time).  Podcast more, blog more.

And, alas, all the things I was thinking “I’ve gotta talk about this” have gone poot from my brain.  Oh well, this is an excuse to sit down in front of the great computer log more often :D .

Cheers!

They Don’t Know #078; Not TV

December 24th, 2009

I finally managed to sit down in front of a microphone and also managed to snag Mark. Thus, we chat about the holiday season (and it’s effect on people and errands), financial planning, and cars. Always cars.

Cheers, please leave a voicemail, and have a good holiday, whatever it may be.  Please feel free to leave a comment or start a discussion in the forum.

epilonious@gmail.com
http://www.epilonious.net
aim/yim/skype: epilonious
voicemail: 678 701 3371

 
icon for podpress  They Don't Know #078; Not TV [41:00m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Dear person from the Internet…

December 21st, 2009

Greetings!

If you’ve just received a link to this… there is a very good chance that you were just very rude to me somewhere on the Internet (most likely twitter or some forum).

Please read the following.

  1. I’m very sorry that you are having a bad day.  Had I known you were having a bad day, I wouldn’t have said whatever it is that upset you to the point where you needed to be nasty to me.
  2. That being said, I suggest you get off the more public parts of the internet.  Retreat to IM and chat with some of your better friends about the stuff that is bugging you, because if you continue to post things publicly, people (like me) are likely to try and comment on them, and might upset you further
  3. I’m sure whatever I said was a bit asshole-ish or a polemic, as I am wont to say asshole-ish or polemic things… But a majority of people have found the things I say sort of funny on good days and/or were able to ignore them on bad days.  Either way, I’m not planning on changing myself for your sake, so I highly suggest you use whatever block or unfollow or ignore features that are available to you, and move on with life.
  4. I’ve probably already ignored/blocked you, because, well, if you got this link what you said must have been pretty icky and stuff like that actually does hurt my feelings when I didn’t expect such a negative sentiment to whatever it is I said.
  5. If you continue to talk smack about me, well, whatever… I’m just glad to know I’m still on your mind that many hours/months/years after whatever perceived infraction.  What I said must have been a real doozy and almost offsets the remorse I feel that you couldn’t find any humor or levity in it.

Either way, cheers, and I hope your day improves.

To watch someone else flounce a con…

December 13th, 2009

So, apparently a popular webcomic* that attended Dragon*Con during 2009 won’t be returning for 2010 Dragon*Con.

The “main guy” representing the comic posted a news item complete with the harrowing tale of a booth mixup during the 2009 con.  The webcomic representatives were of course congenial and wonderful, while the first two waves of Dragon*Con staff were rude and profane, only to be followed by a sweet follow up “lead guy” who not only apologized (the only one apparently) but gave them compensation for the mixup and was polite and secured the webcomic’s interest for returning in 2010.  Cut to late 2009 and the webcomic, frantically trying to confirm their attendance, is rudely told they are not invited back due to “the incident”.  Main guy writes an upset note, fans of the comic swear that this webcomic was the only reason they ever went or were planning on going, and that they will not go, and spread the tale of woe all over the interplanet.  Posts start showing up in other random forums and the consumerist copying the main guys note and throwing Dragon*Con under the conbus.

Now, I went to Dragon*Con, and was wandering around artist’s alley or some other vendors area, and saw this webcomic’s booth.  I read the webcomic so I perked up a little, but then I noticed that the main guy was not there and moved on.  I remember that the booth he had was rather large and in a well traveled section of the room, and didn’t see anything that made me think it was as bad as he described.

Furthermore, there were a few people who posted follow up comments to the news item who suspected shenanigans, some of the more trollish even linking to other artist’s and con-organizer’s tales of that particular webcomic crew as being prone to unprofessional behavior.  Meanwhile, Dragon*Con hasn’t really said anything, and is still listing the webcomic as attending.

The thing that really got me tho, is the notion that if the webcomic folks were so uncannily polite and agreeable when they had spent a lot of time traveling only to find out they were put in a horrible booth and were treated so crappily by lower levels of Dragon*Con staff, why couldn’t they do the polite and agreeable thing and just remove Dragon*Con from their con-roll and maybe post a quick notification about the withdrawal?   Instead, they posted what I perceive to be a full-on flounce.

So, guys, don’t let the door hit your ass on the way out, and that goes double for your fans.

*I’m not going to let on which comic, but it probably won’t be that hard to figure it out.

More Silly Character Bios: Terri, Artie, Tina, and Emma

December 11th, 2009

Terri:

  • Like her ’cause:  She was doing it for the right reasons;  She loves Will and is terrified of losing him.  She knows him rather well, IE getting him an old Camaro knowing he’d love it as a project car.  She is also quite crafty if not a bit sociopathic.
  • Dislike her ’cause:  She did all the wrong things in all the wrong ways.  Lying, letting her dysfunctional relatives run her life, manipulative schemes… and OH MY GOODNESS did I just hate her with every fiber of my being when she let slip “Will, this relationship only works when you’re unhappy!”.
  • What I hope will happen:  I actually want her to find happiness.  It may not be with Will, and she’ll have to start being honest with herself and others rather than being manipulative or trying to use her looks to tide over uncomfortable situations…  But I want her to be happy, and I want her to grow.
  • What I fear will happen:  She won’t learn, she won’t grow, and she’ll become some sort of irritating antagonist who will both pine-for and blame Will for losing her quasi-happy lie-based life.
  • Foil alert:  She and Quinn are foils of each other.  Both have lost everything over a big, fat lie.  Quinn, however, lost everything when she was still in high school (IE, young and ignorant of the world) and has will probably have an easier time recovering from it.  Terri will have to work double time and has much more potential to become bitter and despondent and scary.

Artie:

  • Like him cause:  Sweet, best male singer, best attitude (most of the time), lovably geekish.
  • Disklike him ’cause:  Has self-pity issues, shut down Tina when she ‘fessed-up the facetious nature of her stuttering.
  • What I hope will happen:  He will get over himself, realize the girl he likes likes him back and she told him because she likes and trusts him and it was actually the right thing to do.
  • What I fear will happen:   He loses out on more opportunities to be happy because he sees himself limited or embittered by the lack of useful legs.

Tina:

  • Like her ’cause:  Cyndi Lauper voiced, adorable perky goth.
  • Dislike her ’cause:  Shy and acquiescing to a fault.  I feel like she’s going to throw away every chance to stand up for herself.
  • What I hope will happen:  She grows a bit more of a backbone and does something suitably awesome that takes a lot of personal courage.  Maybe snatch a solo from Rachel AND Mercedes, knock it out of the park, then lay a kiss on Artie so passionate he falls out of his wheelchair.
  • What I fear will happen:  She’ll just sort of sit there and never develop, or Artie and her will keep dancing around each other in some sort of “I want to but I can’t” situation Ad Infinitum.

Emma:

  • Like her ’cause:  She’s the highest functioning and most competent adult on the show, despite severe mysophobia.
  • Dislike her ’cause:  Despite this, she still acts like a 15-year-old around Will,  broke Ken’s heart with wacky wedding schemes, and backed down several times when she was ready to kick some ass.
  • What I hope will happen: She gets Will, she becomes happy, and she punches someone in the face when they get too smack-talky with her (only to whip out some sanitizer and frantically scrub her hands).
  • What I fear will happen:  She turns out to be the rebound, leaves the school but somehow pops up every 7 episodes to distract/complicate Will (at which point I will have to call her ‘Lady Henry Grubstick’)

More silly glee character Bios: Quinn, Will, Sue and Mercedes…

November 29th, 2009

Thanks to ChaliceChick for linking my last set of character Bios, now on to the next set.

Quinn:

  • Like her ’cause:  She has had the most visible progress at becoming a better person on the show.  Granted, she had the most going for her, had the most to lose, and lost most of it.
  • Dislike her ’cause:  She’s can still be really evil and manipulative when she feels like it, and she feels like it way too often for my taste.  Only fate has kept her from following through a course that would truly screw over someone she otherwise cares about.
  • What I hope will happen:  She’ll continue on her way to being a better person, and pass up a chance to be manipulative and controlling because she’s either tired of it or realizes it could hurt people she cares about.
  • What I fear will happen:  She won’t pass up the chance and she’ll end up really screwing herself over and/or someone she cares about
  • Foil alert:  She and Kurt are foils of each other.  Both are very good at reading people and scheming, both are in severe danger of hurting people,  but Kurt has the unconditionally loving mechanic father, and Quinn got the conditionally loving superWASPy parents .

Will:

  • Like him cause:  Sweet and cute, has the biggest dream and seems to be reasonably competent.
  • Disklike him ’cause: Judgemental tunnel vision.  If he gets a notion in his head it takes an act of congress to change it.  He won’t listen to Rachel, he’s convinced Sue is evil, and his lack of critical thought makes it so he keeps falling for the machinations of Terri, Sue, and whoever else wants to tell him a story.
  • What I hope will happen:  He leads the glee club to become champions, surviving the various bombshells which are likely to hit soon with aplomb and grace.
  • What I fear will happen:  He handles bombshells badly and it hurts the glee club and a lot of his relationships because of it.

Sue:

  • Like her ’cause:  Strong, driven, confident, no muss, no fuss, no apologies.  Not actually evil.
  • Dislike her ’cause:  Lowest level of compassion on the show.  Seems like she would actually turn evil without blinking an eye if she felt she needed to.
  • What I hope will happen:  I hope she’s thwarted in her ways to destroy the glee club, but brushes it off like water off a duck’s back.  I also kind of hope she finds some guy and falls in love… and the guy is a pushy authoritarian democrat type.
  • What I fear will happen:  She’ll get thwarted in her ways to destroy the glee club and takes it personal.  That or she doesn’t get thwarted in her ways to destroy the glee club.

Mercedes:

  • Like her ’cause:  Big, Sexy, Sassy black mama.  Great, great GREAT voice.  Has a no BS attitude, but tends to have more tact than anyone else on the show (so long as you don’t spurn her when she has a brick handy).
  • Dislike her ’cause:  She’s the stereotypical sexy black mama.  I want to know more about her, rather than just have her sit around and sass people.
  • What I hope will happen: We learn more about her, and she keeps getting solos.
  • What I fear will happen:  She stays the stereotypical sexy black mama, and her solos drop off.

My Silly Glee Character Bios: Rachel, Finn, Kurt, and Puck…

November 27th, 2009

So, I’ve found myself thinking a lot about how the characters of Glee sit in my mind, and I’ve had fun bouncing my thoughts off people so I figured I would do a short critical analysis of everyone in the show and see how on target I am as things go on.  I also hope to start a discussion, so please feel free to comment or share thoughts.  Also, if you haven’t really watched glee, you probably shouldn’t read any further because of spoilers and the like.

Rachel:

  • Like her ’cause:  She has two gay dads, she has oodles of talent, she has generally good intentions.
  • Dislike her ’cause:  She’s a pedantic know-it-all, and she gets threatened (and more dramatic) whenever anyone else might take a chance she feels she should be hers.
  • What I’d like to see:  Her learn that she gets better attention/respect and builds more friendships by stepping aside and helping more.  She obviously knows her shit, and she’s gained the friendship and respect of Finn by helping him with his singing and being encouraging, so whenever she has little diva hissy fits over Kurt or Tina possibly getting “her” parts rather than, yaknow, giving them a chance or being helpful about it… it breaks my heart.
  • What I fear will happen:  She’ll get the things she wants, and she won’t have motivation to become a better person.  I also fear she might lose opportunities because she burned a bridge over some entitlement issue.

Finn:

  • Like him ’cause:  He’s a sweetheart.  Just one of the most considerate and thoughtful ones on the show.
  • Don’t like him ’cause:  A bit dumb, Let everyone put their needs and hopes into him without proper due diligence.
  • What I’d like to see:  Finn admirably handle all the really crushing and horrible secrets that are very likely going to come to light within the next couple of episodes, accompanied with a bit of a spine implant.
  • What I fear will happen:  Finn will not admirably handle all the really crushing and horrible secrets that are very likely going to come to light within the next couple of episodes, becoming better/vengeful/cruel for a few episodes because of it.

Kurt:

  • Like him ’cause:  Out Gay Kid in High School,  Has the tenacity and intelligence to fight the battles that being the out gay kid in high school will require with aplomb and minimal scarring.  Is fiercely loyal and considerate to friends and family.
  • Dislike him ’cause:  He uses his intelligence and tenacity for evil sometimes, namely to be a manipulative little butt head to his acquaintances to get things he wants.
  • What I hope will happen:  He’ll learn to trust more of the glee club members, get some more really good friends out of it, and become more of a helpful influence and only use his political maneuvering for the sake of The Greater Good (Can you imagine how much fun it would be to see him try and get Sue hooked up with a man?)
  • What I fear will happen:  He’ll get burned for continuing to mess with people, or, worse, watch someone he really get’s cared about get hurt because one of his schemes backfired.
  • Foil alert:  Kurt is foil of both Rachel and Finn.  He has Rachel-esque talent and wisdom, he has Finn-like loyalty and sweetness, but he is much better at reading people than both of them.  It is always ambiguous how he’ll use his skills, however, and that’s what makes him so fascinating.

Puck:

  • Like him ’cause:  Hottest one on the show, also one of the most confident.
  • Dislike him ’cause:  While he seems to be generally a good spirit, he lacks empathy.  You always feel like his shoulder devil is a pushy drunk and his shoulder angel is off getting high half the time.
  • What I hope will happen:  He’ll have some experiences that force him to mature.
  • What I fear will happen:  He’ll get those experiences and still not mature, and get spanked repeatedly for being such a manchild.   That,  and/or he’ll start constantly discussing about honesty because he didn’t get it at 4 years old like everyone else.
  • Foil alert:  Finn’s foil.  Mostly the same but I feel like he traded some of his compassion for some of Finn’s balls.